![starcraft 2 game loops game design starcraft 2 game loops game design](https://icdn.digitaltrends.com/image/digitaltrends/url-e6e54d460d2b16940f6185c7e6b7e2ff-500x500.jpg)
Did you see them? Onewould be the sneak attack ships. The designers of this game implement two negative feedback loops. How do you create a set of rules that maximizes the play of pleasure for your audience? As you shape and sculpt your players' pleasure, you are guiding them between the Scylla and Charybdis of anxiety and boredom.This task is made all the more difficult because, as we know, the experience of play can only be indirectly designed. As they put it,"By choosing to be less concerned with reality and more concerned with what was fun, we created an experience that…is easier to adapt to, quicker to learn, and is a better show." In game design, player experience should always trump so-called "realism."īoredom and anxiety, as game design watchwords, are wonderful because they speak directly to player experience. But Schell and Shochet had no hesitation in making pirate ships "magically" appear to guide the player, or abandoning "realistic" physics to have the player's ship turn on a dime to facilitate navigation. Often in these instances, a desire to "properly" simulate a coherent 3D space or "correctly" output logical behavior for computer-controlled characters overshadows the design of the actual play experience. At the time of its release, Pirates was a very high-tech production, featuring real-time 3D graphics, physically engaging cannon-firing interfaces, and a large motion platform to simulate a pirate ship rocking on the waves. Schell and Shochet are thinking in very experiential terms, using clever techniques to subtly guide player action in meaningful directions. If you find that fighting these enemies is truly fun for the players, you could also switch your game to a fighting one it's your design, you decide. If your goal is to make enemies something the player wants to avoid, give the player a reason to avoid them.
![starcraft 2 game loops game design starcraft 2 game loops game design](https://media.wired.com/photos/598a16934656fd3ef005eda8/2:1/w_1600,h_800,c_limit/StarCraftHP.jpg)
Instead you could give the player absolutely no reward for killing the enemy (no points or anything), you could also make enemy encounters not worth the risk (as in making the player restart the level if an enemy kills them, or have enemies be "thieves" where if they hit you you lose items). You might be thinking that you could just make enemies stronger and therefore make the player want to avoid them -this might just make finding and killing enemies an interesting challenge for the player. You do not want to punish the player as to deter them from playing at all, so what you could do instead is implement a clever negative feedback mechanism. It turns out that too many players are focusing on finding and fighting enemies rather than experiencing your game how you designed it to be experienced. For example say you do not want your game to be focused on fighting, although you want to have an occasional enemy in your game. Negative feedback is not necessarily a punishment, but is used to deter a player from making specific choices. There is also a third category known as negative feedback. Simply put, rewards are great to use to encourage players to make certain choices, and punishments are used to deter certain behavior. The second meaning of positive and negative feedback would be rewards and punshiments to a player. Similarly, you can give advantages to the players in last place to encourage and help them catch up to the leaders. If a leading player seems to be constantly destroying all the other players in an unfair way, create a negative feedback response in which the system (the game) reacts and hinders the leading player. Usually positive feedback loops are harmful to a game's flow (flow will be explained more in depth soon), and should be switched out for negative feedback loops. What's the point of continuing play if the outcome of the match has already been determined in the middle of the game because the leading player has a tremendous advantage over the rest of the players? These types of design flaws can be controlled with positive and negative feedback loops.
![starcraft 2 game loops game design starcraft 2 game loops game design](https://images.gamewatcherstatic.com/news/image/3/05/9073/index_0027087.jpg)
I also see the losers in a game have no means of catching up to the leaders. I also see games made in which the leader has no way of letting the other players catch up to him, because he has such a great advantage over the other players. Too often I see games designed in StarCraft maps that are too hard or too easy, or too hard or too easy once the player reaches a certain point.